Effects of our beliefs are now interfering with what’s called the tech revolution. This happens every time. Before going through the process well, the so called leaders arrive at a destination where everything they find is not good for the community. They even showcase the proof to uphold their claims. What is wrong here is that they over estimate the calculated adversity and under estimate the power of it. Community leaders when they study, they overlap the religious or community theories in the notion of those technology. New technology comes with the power to change the status quo. Changing the status quo means changing the beliefs, which is extreme violation against the law of tribe. So either they say tribe members should keep distance from it or it is wrong. Holding crypto currencies, in the eyes of some Indonesian Muslim tribes, is haram. This is a perfect example.
The first mover advantage maybe a myth like MySpace. It is not necessary to have a first mover advantage, but it may do good if managed correctly. In the world of crypto we could see Bitcoin reigning over a decade as the leading coin. It got its first mover advantage and it is way ahead than other altcoins. But does it means it will lead forever ? Not really. I’m case of Amazon the first mover advantage was a great benefit. It is not that because of Amazon being the first to deliver goods through online, it is the ever growth mindset of Jeff Bezos. Like in case of any other thing, the important factor is not the advantage, but the mindset that drives it behind. Last day I wrote about having a progressive mindset. But when it comes to BTC, the driver behind it is clearly absent. Its first mover advantage is getting it to the top, but as soon as when one person with growth mindset comes with an equivalent product (which already happened), the first mover advantage may slay. ...
Comments
Post a Comment