Most of the time the bad performance is imparted on the employees or those who work as a group. With good equipment and working condition, there is still some huge loses. The revenue steeps down and the operational expenses are shooting up. The reason might be with the leadership. The person at the top must be the reason behind such a drastic fall in the profits or the desired outcome. Under him works the mob and he needs to make sure that they are well protected and safe. Safeness doesn't mean it is of external physical threat, it may be the insecurity that they feel inside the work place. By offering them the security, things would be better.
The first mover advantage maybe a myth like MySpace. It is not necessary to have a first mover advantage, but it may do good if managed correctly. In the world of crypto we could see Bitcoin reigning over a decade as the leading coin. It got its first mover advantage and it is way ahead than other altcoins. But does it means it will lead forever ? Not really. I’m case of Amazon the first mover advantage was a great benefit. It is not that because of Amazon being the first to deliver goods through online, it is the ever growth mindset of Jeff Bezos. Like in case of any other thing, the important factor is not the advantage, but the mindset that drives it behind. Last day I wrote about having a progressive mindset. But when it comes to BTC, the driver behind it is clearly absent. Its first mover advantage is getting it to the top, but as soon as when one person with growth mindset comes with an equivalent product (which already happened), the first mover advantage may slay. ...
Comments
Post a Comment